to serve humanity." Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy. Contents, literature Review on Humanitarian Intervention, in the Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 1 Michelle Maiese offers the following summary about the topic of Humanitarian Intervention: Humanitarian intervention is the threat or use of military force primarily for the purpose of protecting the. Scholarly debates should stop focussing on whether the practice should be allowed or not, and shift to evaluate the expected standard and yardstick of behaviour that must be adhered to during an intervention on humanitarian grounds. What is problematic with the support of human rights institutions or activists, is that they assure necessary consensus for something that can easily go in an unwanted direction, like for instance, an even more brutal civil war after the operation. But, those who know how it actually goes (for example, the author of these lines) know that there would have been much more casualties even if they had been bombed by stones, and not by cluster bombs as nato usually uses. It is about dying, about violence and death. She rejects that all states act based on self-interest, and plans a career within the field of security in order to ensure that humanitarian intervention in the shape military intervention will be based on principles of solitary and promotion of human rights. Sphere Project (2004) Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Relief. And when you do, you discover that virtually every use of military force is described as humanitarian intervention. But this news is not something you are not going to hear during the prime time.
Humanitarian intervention constitutes a calculated and uninvited breach of sovereignty (state rights) in the. Though humanitarian interventions do not necessarily require the employment of military. The doctrine of humanitarian intervention is one of the most highly controversial issues in the world today. Many interventions have been made under the veil of humanitarian reasons, such as the US intervention in Iraq in 1990.
And nothing positive can come out. Nevertheless, a change in public opinion has no effect, because the country is already deeply involved in a war, there is no exit strategy, and immediate cease-fire would mean defeat. Fonteyne, The Customary International Law Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention: Its Current Validity Under the.N. The most important principle in international law is the inviolability of the territorial sovereignty of states. Afghanistan and Iraq were strictly political and economic. But, this is not a legal definition, because still there is no legal definition of humanitarian intervention. But, with a law in place, a minimum standard of accepted behaviour and procedure is set.