(1995) (We hold today that all racial classifications, imposed by whatever federal, state, or local government actor, must be analyzed by a reviewing court under strict scrutiny). Yet, somehow, the majority concludes that petitioner must lose as a result of UTs failure to provide evidence justifying its decision to employ racial discrimination. (June 12, 2015 online at wresearch. Id., at _ (slip., at 11) (internal"tion marks omitted).
In Adarand, for instance, another case in which the Court clarified the rigor of the strict scrutiny standard, the Court acknowledged that its decision altered the playing field in some important respects. These conclusions correspond to the results of nationwide studies showing that high school grades are a better predictor of success in college than SAT scores. In other words, only 21 percent of undergraduate classes with five or more students in them had more than one African-American student enrolled. But UT has never shown that its race-conscious plan actually ameliorates this situation. But UT has long been aware that it bears the burden of justifying its racial discrimination under strict scrutiny. 3d, at 658 (mentioning Asian-Americans only a single time). We did our best to be nonchalant and peered down into the entrance. 6, 2007 cited at 758. . They saw us, turned on their lights, and started driving towards. We left with our giant flourescent orange bolt cutters and headed to campus. See University of Texas at Austin, Records Retention Schedule, Agency Item.
What is essays writing
Literary critical essay the odyssey 1997