nation-state (Rawls view) or fellow human beings across nation-states, within the broader context. 28, 45, 381.12, 384,.16) in seeking to justify a political conception of justice to which people with different comprehensive doctrines or conceptions of the good life can agree within a Western-style liberal democracy with its attendant public culture. 132Thus, the kind of pluralistic, historically enlightened ethical universalism that she wishes to defend would be prepared to leave space to individuals who may wish to adopt a traditional way of life. Pluralism based on epistemic modesty implies a kind of diffidence in the face of alternative standards that is sufficient to prevent the modestly just from condemning the alternative standards. tags: essays research papers Strong Essays 1038 words (3 pages) Preview - Consequentialism is a moral theory which is founded on the premise that an action is morally right if the outcomes of such actions maximize the good and minimize the bad. These human rights violations are being protected under the muse of tradition, or culture. However, Williams observes, the life of a Bronze Age chief or a medieval samurai are not real options for us: there is no way of living them ( ibid, 1985,. . Bonidie University of Phoenix Effect of Cultural Values and Personal Ethics Decisions we make everyday are influenced in part by our core values. Although Williams does not offer a formal definition of what he means by reflection, the following passage serves both to give some sense of what he means and to indicate how, on his account, reflection differs from ethical theory. This essay will argue that these two different rights can neither be conceptualized as the same nor be incorporated mainly because of historical accidents and consequences of the accidents such as nature of the rights and behaviours of imposing states and receiving states.
How people sustain themselves economically, and how they manage to obtain the necessities of life, determines assigned roles of individuals and the relationships among them. In other words, for Habermas, the capacity to provide justificatory reasons is also part of the communicative competence that defines us as members of a linguistic community. So interpreted, cultural relativism allows these corporations to do whatever they like and deem expedient, or strictly in their business interests very narrowly construed. Much explanatory reflection is itself critical, simply in revealing that certain practices or sentiments are not what they are taken. The intensity and divisiveness of these controversies can be felt most acutely in a number of areas.
Thesis cultural relativism