address this dimension of the issue presently under consideration, it may be a good idea to turn now to the political history of stem cell research, or legislation that has surrounding the issue as it has developed over time. Then, it will discuss the scientific history of stem cell research as it has unfolded over the past several years; and after this, it will turn to a consideration of the political history of stem cell research. Professional cover letter ghostwriting sites for phd writing essays apush essay questions college board. Again, given that the potential of stem cell research is directly correlated with the plasticity of the stem cells in question, it logically follows that there will be an increasing push by scientists to focus research on embryonic stem cells if at all possible, due. For example, take medical research. The basic point here would be that human beings are engaging with a dangerous power that may be intimately connected with the very origins of life itself. The power of god? How to Write an Essay. Earthquake essays, thesis ghostwriters site.
On the other hand, if one did believe in God, then it would be possible to argue that stem cell research is an attempt by humans to usurp His role. If this paradigm is accepted, then whatever benefits could be produced by embryonic stem cell research would clearly be outweighed by unacceptability of the atrocities that would need to be committed in order to achieve those benefits. A vast majority of America still believes that this research is unethical and morally incorrect due to preconceived-often incorrect- notions about stem cell research. Esl writers service online how many pages is an essay of 1500 words cheap resume ghostwriting services for school. However, embryonic stem cell research is also generally considered to have the greatest potential for delivering medical and scientific breakthroughs, due to the fact that they are even more flexible (so to speak) and undifferentiated than adult stem cells (see Bongo and Richards).
Several important ethical points are exemplified by this statement, including that embryonic stem cells must be derived using private (and not public) funds and that it still is not acceptable to create embryos simply for the sake of harvesting stem cells from them (and destroying. This is what I am attempting to change! If the federal government is to spend tax money on stem cell research, then this would likely contradict the values of many Americans, and especially conservative Americans, regarding the origins of human life.